• Welcome to SCdev.org. Please log in.

Welcome to the new SCdev forums!

SD/CF benchmarking app

Started by ratx, January 13, 2006, 03:35:37 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

ratx

http://mdxonline.dyndns.org/archives/nds/

Infantile Paralysiser (courtesy of Babel Fish):

Benchmark is measured with each FAT driver chishm.

Diskbench01_OLD_M3SC.nds for M3CF/SCCF
2005-10-16 fatoldunicode MoonShell included version.
Optimized FAT16.

Diskbench01_NEWCPU_M3SC.nds for M3CF/SCCF/SCSD
Gba_nds_fat_SCSDinc_2006-04-01_unicode.

Diskbench01_NEWDMA_M3SC.nds for M3CF/SCCF/SCSD
Gba_nds_fat_SCSDinc_2006-04-01_unicode. Optimized DMA Transfer.

If DMA version is used at high speed CF, the old driver with the new driver as for speed difference the feeling which so is not. However it is slow CF with it is different clearly, the empty it changes with cluster size unconditionally, whether you cannot say.
With saying, because the new driver unless you insert the 16bit automatic recognition cord/code, is not good, so well enough very much. With you say or, as for the SCSD access cord/code being to be the assembler the excessiveness? When you see from the user, as for the person other than SCSD there is only the difference of the sufficient simply it becomes slow, it is.... As for especially me being to be the slow CF user....

http://mdxonline.dyndns.org/archives/nds/

Koji

Wow... that is some pretty horrid engrish... I'm having a hard time making heads or tails of it... but I'll give it a shot.

It looks like it says if the DMA mode is used on high speed CF there doesn't appear to be any speed difference between the old and new drivers. It says, however, that the slower CF cards there is clearly a difference... but then it goes into something about changing the cluster size... I'm afraid the technical jargon either didn't get babelfished well, or I'm just completely lost.

Again... I start to get lost in jargon.... but it sounds like he was openly asking people if they thought the SCSD's slowdown was related to the unoptimized assembler...

-shakes head- wow... I think that's the first time I've come up in so many complete blanks from a babelfish translation. Usually I'm pretty good at pickign out details.